Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Teimuraz Gabashvili Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Haider-Maurer vs Gabashvili analysis and find out who is favored!
Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Teimuraz Gabashvili Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Haider-Maurer 1 - 0 Gabashvili
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Haider-Maurer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Gabashvili has won 46.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Haider-Maurer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gabashvili has won 52.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 44.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Haider-Maurer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gabashvili has saved 48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Haider-Maurer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gabashvili winning 72.97% (W/L 27/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Haider-Maurer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 325/ 199), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13). Gabashvili has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 291/ 242), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 12/ 19).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Haider-Maurer winning 1 times and Gabashvili being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Haider-Maurer winning 2 and Gabashvili winning 1. The last match between Haider-Maurer and Gabashvili was at the Ostrava Challenger, 02-05-2013, Second, Clay with Andreas Haider-Maurer getting the victory 7-6(8) 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:55.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Haider-Maurer and Gabashvili have played a deciding set 1 times, with Haider-Maurer winning 1 times and Gabashvili 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Haider-Maurer winning 1, and Gabashvili 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Haider-Maurer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gabashvili has played against players with an average rank of 41.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Haider-Maurer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gabashvili has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Haider-Maurer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gabashvili has converted 42.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
47
High
37
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
881
Rank
43
High
39
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
57% (447-336)
Career Total W/L
53% (662-592)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
80% (8-2)
$723,565
Career Prize Money
$1,636,260
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Teimuraz Gabashvili For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Haider-Maurer VS Gabashvili
Sportsbook
Offer
Haider-Maurer VS Gabashvili H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Teimuraz Gabashvili |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:55 | 2:19:55 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (50/93) | 56% (57/101) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (38/50) | 67% (38/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (19/43) | 39% (17/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (46/101) | 39% (36/93) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Haider-Maurer VS Gabashvili H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(8) 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Teimuraz Gabashvili |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 70% (16/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (129/87) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 22 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 45 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:19:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 53% (263/500) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (181/263) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (110/237) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (33/78) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (252/532) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/2) |
Andreas Haider-Maurer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Mikhail Balmashev
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alen Avidzba
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
51%
(
42 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
34 of
39)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Arthur De Greef
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
49%
(
17 of
35)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
4
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
17 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
42%
(
35 of
84)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
10
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jonathan Kanar
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
4
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
54 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
121)
130
Total Points Won
121
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Teimuraz Gabashvili Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxim Mrva
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
46%
(
29 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Markus Molder
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Matteo Meneghetti
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
27%
(
7 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
51%
(
29 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Kanan Gasimov
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Zekai Li
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Vishal Saravanan
43%
(
19 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
25 of
33)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Haider-Maurer Vs Gabashvili Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Haider-Maurer are available here and Gabashvili photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
